Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Crocodile Tears Shed over Loss to Downingtown Tax Payers

Downingtown Borough and the developers of the Kardon Ponds project won a victory in Orphans Court last month when Judge Platt – the same judge who ruled against the sale of a part of the Kardon Park land a year ago – quickly agreed with the Borough that no Orphans Court approval was needed for the development of the Borough’s 7 acre compost and trash recycling property in East Caln township. Judge Platt stated that constructing new trails and public parking and pond improvements on the adjacent Kardon Park site as part of the development did not constitute a “sale” of the ground as Mrs. Feldman was trying to assert.


Unfortunately Ann Feldman, using her pro bono attorney immediately appealed the Orphan’s Court ruling to Commonwealth Court. Despite the fact that her appeal is unlikely to be successful and that the project is outside of Kardon Park and has little opposition, Mrs. Feldman once again felt the need to play an obstructionist role, depriving Downingtown and East Caln tax payers of much needed revenue in these exceedingly trying economic times.


Mrs. Feldman’s latest appeal follows her appeal last summer of Judge Nagle’s decision affirming East Caln’s approval of the Millrace development. After more than two years of planning, East Caln township supervisors voted to approve the 70 home Millrace project on land owned by the Borough adjacent to Kardon Park. Ann Feldman appealed the East Caln approval to Chester County Common Pleas court. Judge Nagel denied her appeal las June, issuing a strongly worded opinion in favor of the Borough and East Caln township. Nevertheless, Mrs. Feldman decided to appeal Judge Nagle’s decision to Commonwealth Court.


Despite these legal decisions confirming the Borough’s right to sell this 7 acre parcel, Mrs. Feldman appears to be desperately scrambling for more roadblocks she can erect to proposed park improvements and the sale of any ground that will provide relief to the taxpayers. This week, Ann Feldman filed yet another lawsuit – this time challenging the Borough’s entering into a revised Agreement of Sale for the Kardon property. The Borough Council decided it had to re-do the agreement of sale with the developers in part to correct a minor administrative error in the original version. If that minor mistake had been left uncorrected, the Borough would have been vulnerable to another lawsuit by Mrs. Feldman in the future -- after all other legal battles had been exhausted.


The revised Agreement of Sale reduces the purchase price for the Kardon lands by approximately 15%. The reduction is directly attributable to the costs incurred by the developer in the 4+ years of litigation and delays caused by Mrs. Feldman’s obstructionism as well as future costs anticipated to defend all of her law suits. That she would now decry the proposed purchase price reduction of $830,000 as unfairly costing Borough taxpayers seems hypocritical by any measure. Borough taxpayers need look no farther than Ann Feldman herself for the loss of these future dollars.


Without a doubt, Ann Feldman has cost the taxpayers millions of additional dollars. Here are just some of the costs and losses to Downingtown Borough tax payers that are directly attributable to Mrs. Feldman’s obstructionism:


- The Borough lost a nearly $1 million State clean up grant due to Mrs. Feldman’s lawsuits which caused the Borough to miss the deadline for use of the funds.


- The Borough lost a roughly $250,000 community revitalization grant from the County to extend the Struble trail into the center of Downingtown. Another Borough won the grant instead of Downingtown for a project their community appeared to want.


- Borough Council had to raise Borough property taxes twice (about $140 average per tax payer) due to insufficient revenues. These tax increases could have been avoided had the Kardon Park development gone through.


- The Borough has been forced to issue a bond to cover its operations and capital projects, which means future interest costs to tax payers. This would have been avoided had the Kardon development gone through.


- The Borough did not receive $2.3 million in land purchase price to fund the construction of the new Minquas fire station – see need for bond issue above.


- Because the new Minquas fire station was not built, the Molly Maguires restaurant did not yet come to Downingtown, costing the Borough tax payers thousands of dollars of lost revenue from patrons of the restaurant.


- Borough tax payers lost nearly $1.3 million in fees and tax revenues (income tax, property tax and transfer tax) from 60 new homes that did not happen over the past 2 years due to Mrs. Feldman’s delays.


- Approximately $400,000 in additional land purchase price was foregone in addition to the lost $2.3 million mentioned above.


- The Kardon Park contamination resulting from the historic dumping on the property was not remediated by the developers at no cost to tax payers.


- The extensive park improvements such as new trails, new parking, fresh water pond improvements, and wetlands plantings did not take place by the developer at no cost to taxpayers.


- The substantial traffic improvements on Pennsylvania Avenue did not take place by the developers which would have alleviated traffic congestion at no cost to tax payers.


- Over 185 jobs did not get created due to project’s failure to start.


- More than $80,000 in net revenues was lost to the Downingtown school district which is already suffering under the present climate of cut backs and reduced tax revenue.


- The County lost approximately $160,000 in tax revenue after expenses.


And what is the price tag on the wasted manpower and resources that could have been better spent attracting new businesses to Downingtown and growing the tax base?


Please send a personal request to Mrs. Feldman to stop using the legal system to take your tax dollars at afeldman@downingtown.org or 610-518-0964. As a member of Borough Council, it is her responsibility to represent your best interests above her own. Please make her aware of that. Please copy idealdowningtown@gmail.com.


Saturday, November 19, 2011

Orphans Court rules that East Caln portion of Kardon Ponds may proceed

Judge Platt has issued her ruling that the Millrace portion of Kardon Ponds community does not require Orphan's Court approval. Read her decision below.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION

IN RE: COUNCIL OF BOROUGH OF DOWNINGTOWN

1511-1629

AND NOW, this 17 day of November, 2011, upon

consideration of the Petition of the Borough of Downingtown, J. Loew & Associates, Inc. and Progressive Housing` Ventures, LLC for Declaration that no Orphans' Court approval is required for the utilization of certain real property retained in the Borough, the response thereto, and after oral argument, it is hereby Ordered that the Petition is granted. No approval by the Orphans' Court is required, as the Donated or Dedicated Property Act is not implicated.'

BY THE COURT:

Katherine B. L. Platt, J.

Petitioners J.Lowe & Associates, Inc. and Progressive Housing Ventures, LLC own 7 acres of property in East Cain Township. It is undisputed that the 7 acres is land that has not been donated or dedicated for the public use. The Borough of Downingtown has agreed to grant Petitioners two easements: one to discharge stormwater into an existing pond located in an area dedicated to the public, known as Kardon Park, and on to perform improvements and environmental remediation.

Petitioners and the Borough contend that Orphans' Court approval is not required for the grant of the proposed easements.

The Orphans' Court has jurisdiction to settle disputes concerning a municipality's decision to sell or discontinue use of dedicated or donated property.

Donated or Dedicated Property Act ("DDPA"), 53 P. S. §§3381-3386. Section 3384 of the DDPA, provides that when the original use of a particular property held in trust as a public facility is no longer practicable or possible and has ceased to serve the public interest, the municipality acting as trustee of the property may apply to the Orphans' court of the county in which it is located for appropriate relief. The court may permit the trustee to-

(1) Substitute other lands or property of at least equal size and value held or to be acquired by the political subdivision in exchange for the trust property in order to carry out the trust purposes.

(2) If other property is not available, sell the property and apply the proceeds to carry out the trust purposes.

(3) In the event the original trust purpose is no longer practicable or possible or in the public interest, apply the property or the proceeds therefrom in the case of a sale to a different public purpose.

(4) Relinquish, waive or otherwise quitclaim all right and title of the public in and to such land and buildings as have been apparently dedicated but for which no formal acceptance appears of record: Provided, only, That the court is satisfied upon hearing the evidence that there is no acceptance by implication arising out of public user or otherwise, the court shall also determine the consideration, if any, to be paid to the political subdivision.

(53 P. S. §3384, emphasis added).

In order for the DDPA to apply, there must be a sale or alienation of property held in trust for the public. As stated above, the 7 acre parcel in East Caln Township is not property held in trust for the public. The grant of easements to discharge stormwater into a pond located on Kardon Park, and to perform temporary construction improvements is not a sale of the property, nor a change of the use of the property. An "easement" is a liberty, privilege, or advantage which one may have in the lands of another without profit... But it cannot be an estate or interest in the land itself, or a right to any part of it. An easement is a right in the owner of one parcel of land by reason of such ownership to use the land of another for a special purpose not inconsistent with a general property in the owner. Assalita v. Chestnut Ridge Homeowners Ass'n, 866 A.2d 1214, 1218 (Pa. Cmwlth.

2005)(citations omitted). Additionally, a municipality has the right to upgrade facilities that are used for the public.

Kardon Park will continue to be used for public park purposes after the creation of the easements. Thus, the proposed use does not violate the DDPA or the public trust doctrine, and Orphans' Court approval is not required for the utilization of the real property.

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Is the Struble Trail Another Victim of NIMBYism?

The Chester County Department of Community Development has just announced its annual grants. Unfortunately the much-anticipated extension of the Struble Trails from its current terminus at Norwood Road along the former rail line to Pennsylvania Avenue did not receive funding - despite all the positive indications previously.

The Stuble Trail is a terrific asset to Downingtown and the surrounding area. The extension of the trail would have had a covered bike shelter at Pennsylvania Avenue where hikers and bikers could park and walk to into town and enjoy the restaurants, cafes and shops there. In addition the extension would have been a key link in the greater Chester Valley trail system that the County has been planning for years.

Nearly everyone supported the extension of the Struble Trail with two notable exceptions.

In a April 27th article in the Daily Local News reporting on the Council vote to enter into the lease agreement with PECO for the trail extension area, it was reported that Kim Manufacturing opposed having the trail go behind its building, in part, because it felt it had ownership rights to a portion of the trail easement area land.

Councilwoman Ann Feldman voiced the only other dissenting point of view saying, “If the development doesn’t go through, you wouldn’t want the trail.”

Mayor Josh Maxwell convinced Ms. Feldman to vote for the easement purchase by explaining, “Even if the development doesn’t go through, we could use the trail to create a loop (with Lion’s Trail)”.

If the proposal to clean up Kardon Park to construct housing on less than half the land had not been opposed by a small group of NIMBY citizens, this proposed section of the Struble Trail would be connected to a wonderful network of improved and new trails and trail parking within the remediated and undeveloped 22-acres of Kardon Park.

Both opponents of the Struble Trail extension are also the opponents of the Kardon Park redevelopment project. Did their public opposition have anything to do with the County’s denying the Borough this grant when these grants are so competitive and dependent on unified public support? You be the one to decide. Regardless, the residents of the Downingtown area have been denied a wonderful resource for walking dogs, strolling with children, biking into the Borough for lunch or just getting fit on your lunch hour or weekends.

This is another blow for those who believe Downingtown can be an even better town if we believe change can be for the better.

If you want to be part of the effort to get Downingtown’s future back on track, Like us on Facebook by clicking the link below or sign up for our e mail updates at IDEALDowningtown@gmail.com.

You can read the entire article on the Struble Trail extension at http://dailylocal.com/articles/2010/04/27/news/srv0000008134738.prt